We are losing the battle against the growing illegal commercial trade in bushmeat because of the following;
- Bushmeat is cheaper than beef; thus it is a cheaper source of protein to rural and urban poor.
- Rising poverty and landlessness among communities living adjacent to wildlife rich areas worsened by the prevailing drought and food shortage in the country.
- Rising incidences human wildlife conflict cases and lack compensation for such loses caused by wildlife
- Weak wildlife laws that do not give deterrent fines and sentences to convicted poachers and traders.
- Poor knowledge of wildlife laws leads to wildlife crimes being categorized as misdemeanour.
- Weak law enforcement that allows poaching cartels to thrive.
- Civil police prosecute wildlife crimes-whereas ideally it should be handled by wildlife authorities, preferably KWS prosecutors.
- Serial poachers are treated as first offenders in wildlife crimes and most of them are able to pay the small fines imposed and quickly return to make easy money from the illegal trade.
- Continued impasse on the wildlife policy review leading to disenchantment by communities and land owners hosting wildlife (outside the tourism circuit) making them turn a blind eye to poaching as a way of removing a pest that doesn’t benefit them.
- A blanket ban on consumptive use criminalized what had been part of the culture and source of food for some communities like the Kamba, Turkana, mijikenda Taita etc. They were left withour a viable alternative and hence this ban never worked for bushmeat.
As Kenyans, we need to address the issues raised above if we are to eradicate the illegal bushmeat trade in our country. The wildlife policy review offers us the best oportunity and let us not lose it.
Iregi Mwenja is a Bushmeat researcher and a USFWS MENTOR Post-graduate Fellow on Bushmeat in East Africa.
Dik dik meat being prepared for urban market outside the Tsavos
Technorati : Bushmeat, poaching, wildlife policy






10 Comments
That is certainly a daunting list of challenges, Mwenja, but I wonder why you don’t list human overpopulation as a factor in the illegal bushmeat trade? Is it because you don’t believe human overpopulation is a problem or just not a problem in this situation?
Thanks,
s.
Sheryl,
I agree with you overpopulation should be on the list, probably at the top. Remember my article on human overpopulation? http://bushmeateastafrica.wildlifedirect.org/2008/05/27/with-50-million-people-in-2020-there-will-be-no-wildlife-outside-parks-updated-version/
I remember that post and that’s why I’m surprised not to see human overpopulation on your list. Thanks, Mwenja, for the quick response.
s.
I agree. Without containing the burgeoning human population all other wildlife conservation strategies will ultimately fail.
When the human population in Kenya was 4 million in 1950 there was little human/wildlife conflict and some animals could be harvested in a sustainable manner.
Today with the human population at or near 40 million… people and wildlife are scrambling to get the last of the remaining essential resources-water and land. What chance is there for the future of wildlife if this trend does not stabilize?
Katherine,
I totally agree with you. Which bring me to the question, why all the silence from environmental conservationists about human overpopulation which if addressed could greatly reduced the pressure on mother nature? Are we hoping that soon a ‘pandemic’ will hit us and do the work for us? With the current trend particularity in the third world, where will our world be in 100 years? A rock with skeletons scattered all over?
These are questions I hate to ask!
Well, if anyone’s waiting for a pandemic, hold onto your socks ’cause I think we might have one. The swine flu variant in Mexico is now in New Zealand, several states in the U.S. and Canada.
As for human overpopulation, the argument I hear continually is that it’s a basic “human right” to procreate. I argue that when this basic human right interferes with the rights of other humans to live sustainably and interferes with the rights of non-human animals to live at all, that it’s a bogus argument.
In 100 years I think people will be living on Soylent Green.
s.
Soylent Green? We will be there by 2022!
Do you know of people who run a campaign against human overpopulation?
You might be right about 2022!
This group, Population Connection, used to be called Zero Population Growth. They’ve been around since the 1960s and it looks like they’re still running education campaigns: http://www.populationconnection.org/
s.
Wow…..we knew it was coming..I am not sure what to day…checked out the population connection website….thanks for the info Sheryl..you are so knowledgeable!
it seems just a cruel thing to do… im not at all educated about any of this like yall are… but seeing heads of monkeys on tables, is just sickening.. yeah i agree it has to do with all these mouths that need to be fed. just wish something would happen to benefit humans & animals. maybe people should eat animals who can reproduce quick, & then aid in the reproduction. Ya know what i mean….. im young, & thats my reasoning ^_^ thanks!
One Trackback
[...] Mwenja of the Bushmeat in Kenya blog gave us several pointers as to why we may lose the fight against illegal bushmeat in Kenya. The overriding reasons they provided for this unfortunate realization was because of bad laws, [...]